T1555.003: Credentials from Web Browsers

View on MITRE ATT&CK T1555.003
Tactic(s) Credential Access

Data from MITRE ATT&CK®:

Adversaries may acquire credentials from web browsers by reading files specific to the target browser.(Citation: Talos Olympic Destroyer 2018) Web browsers commonly save credentials such as website usernames and passwords so that they do not need to be entered manually in the future. Web browsers typically store the credentials in an encrypted format within a credential store; however, methods exist to extract plaintext credentials from web browsers.

For example, on Windows systems, encrypted credentials may be obtained from Google Chrome by reading a database file, AppData\Local\Google\Chrome\User Data\Default\Login Data and executing a SQL query: SELECT action_url, username_value, password_value FROM logins;. The plaintext password can then be obtained by passing the encrypted credentials to the Windows API function CryptUnprotectData, which uses the victim’s cached logon credentials as the decryption key.(Citation: Microsoft CryptUnprotectData April 2018)

Adversaries have executed similar procedures for common web browsers such as FireFox, Safari, Edge, etc.(Citation: Proofpoint Vega Credential Stealer May 2018)(Citation: FireEye HawkEye Malware July 2017) Windows stores Internet Explorer and Microsoft Edge credentials in Credential Lockers managed by the Windows Credential Manager.

Adversaries may also acquire credentials by searching web browser process memory for patterns that commonly match credentials.(Citation: GitHub Mimikittenz July 2016)

After acquiring credentials from web browsers, adversaries may attempt to recycle the credentials across different systems and/or accounts in order to expand access. This can result in significantly furthering an adversary's objective in cases where credentials gained from web browsers overlap with privileged accounts (e.g. domain administrator).

© 2024 The MITRE Corporation. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of The MITRE Corporation.

Cyber Threat Graph Context

Explore how this ATT&CK Technique relates to the wider threat graph

Reporting on this Technique

Report

CACTUS Ransomware: Prickly New Variant Evades Detection

This report by Kroll outlines TTPs and IoCs associated with CACTUS ransomware actors.

Report

APT40 Advisory - PRC MSS tradecraft in action

This advisory, authored by the Australian Cyber Security Centre and multiple other international cybersecurity agencies, outlines the threat posed ...

Report

Russian Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR) Exploiting JetBrains TeamCity CVE Globally

This Cybersecurity Advisory by CISA with US and international partners outlines activity which they link to APT29 (also known as The Dukes, Cozy ...

Report

Detailed Analysis of DarkGate

This post on Medium by S2W presents a technical analysis of DarkGate malware and the operator behind it. According to the report, DarkGate is a ...

Report

REDCURL - The pentest you didn't know about

This report by researchers at Group-IB outlines activity by a group they call RedCurl. The report identifies victimology and motivation (corporate ...

Report

StopRansomware: Phobos Ransomware

This is a joint Cybersecurity Advisory produced by CISA, the FBI and the Multi-State Information Sharing and Analysis Center (MS-ISAC). It ...

Report

PRC State-Sponsored Actors Compromise and Maintain Persistent Access to U.S. Critical Infrastructure

Following an initial advisory issued in May 2023, this advisory from CISA, NSA and partners outlines information on the broader campaign of cyber ...

Mitigations for this technique

MITRE ATT&CK Mitigations

How to detect this technique

MITRE ATT&CK Data Components

Control Validation Tests for this Technique

Use Atomic Red Team tests to test your defenses against this technique.

Sigma Detections for this Technique